fbpx

Getting More out of Anaerobic Digestion

11.22.2017

Nigel Lee, General Manager at Amur, says that anaerobic digestion plants need to work harder to improve gas yields if they are to achieve their budgeted income.

Over the past 10 years, anaerobic digestion (AD) has taken the country by storm. There are now enough AD plants in the UK to power a million plus homes but, even as technology and know-how improves, many are not fulfilling their potential. Failing to deliver on gas results in reduced income and missed targets – in effect, the plant operates as an expensive waste management solution rather than an effective renewable energy business. So why has this situation arisen, and what can operators do to improve performance?

When the UK’s first food waste AD, Greenfinch, began trials in 2006, it was met with wonder by a waste management industry just starting to contemplate the prospect of household food waste collections. AD was already in use by the water and sewage industries, but for food waste it represented a panacea. Today, many food manufacturers and local authorities specify AD for residual food waste, but show little interest in how effective plants are.

The best measure for performance is load factor, or running time. Recent years have witnessed phenomenal improvements – even six years ago, average load factors sat at just 46%, compared with 73% in 2016. However, with the most efficient operators reporting levels of 98%, many in the industry still have a long way to go.

The biggest barrier is feedstock. Despite murmurs from central government on separate food waste collections for all households in England – in line with Wales and Scotland – collections currently lie at just over 50%. Similarly, the bulk of commercial food waste collected does not make it to AD either.

However responsibly food is prepared, an element of food waste will always remain, and once reduction and redistribution have been addressed, waste management firms need to actively encourage separate collections and build relationships with AD businesses to ensure food waste meets its potential.

Better reporting can help. Typically, food waste producers receive a paltry ‘tonnage recycled’ figure for their material; reporting on methane levels and gas yields helps to position food waste as a genuine resource, and also make operators reflect on performance.

On the ground, improved feeding regimes have a direct impact on gas produced. AD is all about maintaining good biology, and good biology relies on consistency. This means sticking to one type of feedstock or, where that is not possible, giving the bacteria time to adapt.

According to the Anaerobic Digestion and Bioresources Association’s (ADBA) 2017 Anaerobic Digestion Market & Policy Report, plants typically run at 80% capacity; without sufficient feedstock available, they are forced to chop and change in line with what is on offer. Adversely, a common mistake is to over-feed a plant, thinking that greater volumes of feedstock will result in more gas.

Smaller plants may not have access to teams of biologists, but they are able to employ an external lab to monitor performance, and to seek expert advice on balancing feedstocks for better performance. Biological support for AD is a growing area and specialists can recommend everything from helpful additives to a full change in diet. The key is to find a partner that will look for patterns over time and work to anticipate changes before problems occur.

Recent changes to renewables incentives mean that agricultural plants coming onto the market will need to include a fraction of food waste in their ration. Based on the current climate, it seems likely that unless waste managers and local authorities do more to drive material to AD, feedstock shortages, and under-performance, will become increasingly acute.

Nigel Lee is General Manager at anaerobic digestion services provider Amur Energy.

Article cited from: https://goo.gl/JLdGFW 

 

 

 

 

 

 

News/Events 

  1. Difference between a Turbo and Positive Displacement Blower
  2. The Difference between Methane and Natural Gas
  3. First Dairy Biogas Project in Connecticut
  4. Does Renewable Natural Gas Have a Future in Energy?
  5. Biogas Offtake Opportunities For Digesters
  6. Wisconsin Dairy Begins Production of Renewable Natural Gas
  7. Anaerobic Digestion Sector Forming a Clearer Picture
  8. Brightmark to Expand Western New York Dairy Biogas Project
  9. Biogas - The Energy Wonder That's Under Our Noses
  10. Power Generation Achieved by a Self-Assembled Biofuel Cell
  11. Less Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas
  12. Project Uses Renewable Electricity for RNG Production
  13. Smithfield Hog Farm Provides Natural Gas to Missouri City
  14. From Waste to Gas
  15. Gas Clash Threatens Australian Export
  16. Maximizing Opportunities of Anaerobic Digestion from Wastewater
  17. Catalyst to Speed up Conversion of Biomass to Biofuel
  18. How It Works: Ethanol
  19. Anaerobic Digestion - the Next Big Renewable Energy Source
  20. Anaerobic Additions
  21. Three (3) Tech Solutions for Modern Landfills
  22. The Costs and Benefits of Anaerobic Digesters
  23. Bacteria Farts Power Wastewater Plant in Fort Wayne
  24. Europe’s First Poultry Manure Biogas Plant
  25. Electricity Using Pig Manure
  26. $38-Million Biodigester coming to Grand Rapids
  27. Biochar Could Benefit Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Manure
  28. Getting More out of Anaerobic Digestion
  29. Biogas prevents 20 million tonnes of CO2 emissions per year
  30. Converting to green gas grid ‘could be vital’

 

For additonal reading, please visit us at: News Worthy

Difference between a Turbo and Positive Displacement Blower