fbpx

Vaporized Hog Waste Testing to Begin

07.13.2015

Plasma Energy Group, based out of Florida, is planning to test a new vaporizing technology on hog waste produced at Sandy River Farm in Conway County this month. The objective is to start using the technology at C&H Hog Farms in Newton County to allay concerns of environmental groups upset about C&H's presence in the Buffalo River watershed.

Initially, Plasma Energy Group, C&H Hog Farms and Cargill - which owns the hogs at C&H Hog Farms - planned to test the technology on-site in Mount Judea, but Cargill spokesman Mike Martin said that changed after meetings with concerned parties in Northwest Arkansas. Cargill owns the Sandy River Farm facility and its hogs, and is choosing the site as a replacement outside the Buffalo River watershed, which is the area surrounding the river where water drains into it.

Cargill, a multinational agricultural corporation, can't begin testing until it receives a prototype of the technology from Plasma Energy Group, a Port Richey, Fla., company.

Cargill spokesman Mike Martin said the prototype wasn't ready yet and that his company hasn't heard from Plasma Energy Group in about a month.

Plasma Energy Group President Murry Vance said he believed the company would begin testing this month at Sandy River Farm.

"It will happen in July," he said. "I don't know the exact date yet."

If all goes well, Vance said, the company expects to begin using the technology at C&H Hog Farms in August.

Vance said last fall that his company would begin testing the vaporizing technology early in 2015. But Cargill wants to make sure "everything is perfect" before the technology can be used at C&H Hog Farms, Vance said.

The Department of Environmental Quality warned Plasma Energy Group in October that testing the technology could result in enforcement action if the technology resulted in gas discharges that would require an air permit. The department had been unable to determine whether Plasma Energy Group needed an air permit because it did not receive enough data from the company on projected gas discharges from vaporizing hog waste. The company has vaporized some materials before, but never hog waste.

Department of Environmental Quality spokesman Katherine Benenati said department officials have not heard anything new from Plasma Energy Group since last fall.

Vance said he hasn't spoken to anyone at the department since October.

Meanwhile, Vance has maintained his plans, saying last year that the size of the machine that would be used would produce less emissions than a commercial lawn mower.

He said his company has since been testing cow manure and other waste without any problems. Liquid pig waste is easier to vaporize than "high solid" materials his company is used to vaporizing, he added.

Plasma Energy Group started in 2013, but Vance has said he has been using the vaporizing technology - called plasma arc pyrolysis - since 1992. Plasma arc pyrolysis typically involves the conversion of material into synthetic gas. In the case of C&H, Vance has said the waste won't be turned into synthetic gas because the quantity of material won't be large enough.

The method proposed for the C&H farm would break down the hog waste and vaporize it using an electron discharge and some heat, then condense the water vapor into "semi-pure" water that's put back into the plant.

Plasma Energy Group's contract is with C&H Hog Farms, but Cargill officials have been looking for ways to address the environmental backlash against the company for its involvement with C&H Hog Farms' construction on Big Creek, 6 miles from where it meets the Buffalo National River.

Vaporizing is a possible way to reduce the volume of waste from the facility that is spread on fields for agricultural purposes.

"Cargill's willing to conduct that [plasma arc pyrolysis testing] at Sandy River, and we believe it's the right thing to do," Martin said.

"The thought behind looking at this technology is that there are those who believe that spreading manure on crop fields in the Buffalo River watershed near C&H Hog Farm is going to result in the manure somehow getting into the water," Martin said.

"And so we have looked at a number of technologies or explored a number of ideas or options -- most of them are conceptual, such as plasma energy concept. The thought behind that is if we can reduce the volume that is spread on the fields by employing some other technology that will cost-effectively eliminate the waste, even though we feel it has a legitimate purpose as a fertilizer, that could potentially allay the concerns out there that fertilizer might get into the water system."

Environmental groups have been concerned about the potential for a hog waste lagoon failure that would run into Big Creek and then into the Buffalo River, in addition to concern that the rough karst terrain surrounding the river would lead to elevated pollutants from hog manure applied to the ground for agricultural purposes.

A University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture study is looking at the impact of runoff into Big Creek and the waste ponds themselves.

In May, C&H submitted a proposed modification to its permit to add covers on the hog waste lagoons that would capture gas emitted from them and then send it through an upward pipe to flare and burn it.

Gordon Watkins, president of the Buffalo River Watershed Alliance, which was formed in response to C&H Hog Farms' construction in 2013, said Cargill's time, energy and money might be better spent moving the operation out of the watershed.

"Generally ... they seem to be throwing every technology at this thing to try and make sure it stays where it's located," Watkins said.

The Buffalo National River -- the country's first national river -- is a popular tourist spot, with more than 1.3 million visitors in 2014, who spent about $56.5 million at area businesses, according to National Park Service data.

C&H Hog Farms is permitted to hold up to 2,500 sows and 4,000 piglets at a time. Small hog farms have existed in the watershed for years, but C&H is the first large-scale hog facility in the watershed.

On Monday, a state legislative committee advanced a proposed five-year ban on new medium or large hog farms in the watershed.

Article cited from: http://goo.gl/KrrqkD

 

News/Events 

  1. Difference between a Turbo and Positive Displacement Blower
  2. The Difference between Methane and Natural Gas
  3. First Dairy Biogas Project in Connecticut
  4. Does Renewable Natural Gas Have a Future in Energy?
  5. Biogas Offtake Opportunities For Digesters
  6. Wisconsin Dairy Begins Production of Renewable Natural Gas
  7. Anaerobic Digestion Sector Forming a Clearer Picture
  8. Brightmark to Expand Western New York Dairy Biogas Project
  9. Biogas - The Energy Wonder That's Under Our Noses
  10. Power Generation Achieved by a Self-Assembled Biofuel Cell
  11. Less Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas
  12. Project Uses Renewable Electricity for RNG Production
  13. Smithfield Hog Farm Provides Natural Gas to Missouri City
  14. From Waste to Gas
  15. Gas Clash Threatens Australian Export
  16. Maximizing Opportunities of Anaerobic Digestion from Wastewater
  17. Catalyst to Speed up Conversion of Biomass to Biofuel
  18. How It Works: Ethanol
  19. Anaerobic Digestion - the Next Big Renewable Energy Source
  20. Anaerobic Additions
  21. Three (3) Tech Solutions for Modern Landfills
  22. The Costs and Benefits of Anaerobic Digesters
  23. Bacteria Farts Power Wastewater Plant in Fort Wayne
  24. Europe’s First Poultry Manure Biogas Plant
  25. Electricity Using Pig Manure
  26. $38-Million Biodigester coming to Grand Rapids
  27. Biochar Could Benefit Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Manure
  28. Getting More out of Anaerobic Digestion
  29. Biogas prevents 20 million tonnes of CO2 emissions per year
  30. Converting to green gas grid ‘could be vital’

 

For additonal reading, please visit us at: News Worthy

Difference between a Turbo and Positive Displacement Blower